It's the children, again
There they go again. Endangering children. What's the word for imposing only risk and downside without firmly established benefits and upside? (updated 6/13)
What’s the word?
The word might be greed. This word may fit well for the pushers, the large pharmaceutical companies, the captured government officials and politicians who get ‘royalty’ kickbacks and graft.
The word might be cowardice. This word may fit well for the enablers, the members of the medical community that are not speaking up, the members of the VRBPAC.
Time again for a call to action for our children (and our souls). Because of this:
Where are the mamas?
Where are the papas?
Where are those who will say no to the offenders, no to those who have abdicated their responsibility to protect the populace including our children for power and money, no to experimental injectable biologics that have no benefit in the healthy young and carry inordinate risks.
Comment by June 7th here:
Several writers have been contributing on this atrocity-in-the-making. Allow me to keep this post brief and reference a few posts by some who have been able to look deeply into this topic:
Children’s Health Defense
Unacceptable Jessica
uTobian
What is the word? The word can be yours.
Please take a look at the following posts, consider raising your voice, consider spreading the word.
Children’s Health Defense
Action Alert: Tell the FDA to Get Their #HandsOffOurChildren
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is declaring war on our children and it’s on each of us to be unrelenting as we defend the next generation from Big Pharma and its allies. We must stop the FDA’s attack, beginning with a campaign to end unethical and unsubstantiated Emergency Use Authorizations (EUA) that will subject our younger and most vulnerable children to the unnecessary risks of COVID shots.
The FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) is scheduled to meet on four separate occasions in June to discuss additional EUAs that would provide cradle-to-grave COVID shots and consider a “Future Framework” that will permanently lower the bar for safety and efficacy going forward.
Their itinerary is as follows:
June 7 — Emergency Use Authorization for Novavax’s COVID shot for adults.
June 14 — Amendment to Moderna’s EUA to include primary series to children and adolescents 6 through 17 years of age.
June 15 — Amendment to Moderna’s EUA to include primary series for children 6 months to 5 years and amendment to Pfizer’s EUA to include the primary series to children 6 months through 4 years of age.
June 28 — Proposed “Future Framework” for COVID shots.
SOURCE:
URGENT! Send Your Lawmakers RFK, Jr.’s Letter to FDA VRBPAC Committee Members
Please take 30 seconds to tell your lawmakers to STOP the FDA from granting EUAs for COVID vaccines in babies and children by sending Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s letter to FDA VRBPAC committee members. His letter lays out all of the available science and data that proves vaccinating children for COVID is not only unnecessary, but will recklessly endanger their lives. There is no emergency whatsoever for children from COVID, therefore there is no justification for issuing an Emergency Use Authorization.
SOURCE:
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s letter to FDA VRBPAC committee members
We are writing to put you on notice that should you recommend these pediatric EUA vaccines to children 6 months through 17 years old, CHD is poised to take legal action against you. CHD will seek to hold you accountable for recklessly endangering our children with products that have little, no, or even negative net efficacy but which may put them, without warning, at risk of many adverse health consequences, including heart damage, stroke, and other thrombotic events and future reproductive harms.
We briefly outline why such a recommendation would be reckless for nearly 74 million children in the United States and millions more around the world.
SOURCE:
Unacceptable Jessica
Please head to this fantastic new document released 2 days before the VRBPAC meeting. Read this quote from page 13 to get some context. You know, how many infants they injected, how they pretended to do adequate immunogenicity study using ‘immunobridging’ and how they only had serological data from 146 BNT162b2 recipients and 73 placebo recipients. Just as a start.
Just so you know, they determined the efficacy of this dose of Pfizer products in infants by measuring and comparing the concentration of neutralizing antibodies against a ‘randomly selected subset’ of 16-25-year-old participants. I’m sorry, but that’s absolute sheit. You can read Toby’s Substack to find out how and why in a more detailed way.
SOURCE:
As most of you probably know, in a few days, the VRBPAC meeting will happen again. This time around, they have decided, ahem, will decide, on whether infants (6 months-4 years) should be injected with the COVID-19 injectable products. Yes, the same products with proven lamentable efficacy by their own admission (36.8% in 2-5 year olds), and horrific safety profiles and you will see.
SOURCE:
Please go to the end of this Substack to find out how to be active in stopping the madness by making a public comment by the 7th of June, 2022 here.
I knew this was the end goal for the constant push to creep these experimental products into younger and younger age groups, but I am surprised to see this listed on the ‘vaccine schedule’ so soon. I mean, nothing should surprise me at this point, but I still have a good head on my shoulders so the potential is there.
Did you guys know that if you successfully get a vaccine on the schedule your yearly profit is in the billions? That’s billions. With a ‘b’. But health, right?
By the way, the NHS are ‘here for you’.
SOURCE:
uTobian
On Friday, the FDA released its risk benefit assessment of Moderna’s Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) application to inject mRNA into kids 0 to 17 years old. I’ve been reading it for the past two days and here are the things that stood out to me.
SOURCE:
None of the Moderna or Pfizer clinical trials in kids showed any real world health benefit at all. So they switched to looking at antibodies in the blood and use this tortured mental gymnastics called “immunobridging” to conjure up hypothetical future benefits that never materialize in the real world. Abandoning even the pretense of human trials and moving to test tubes and mice is the obvious next step in this complete abandonment of science.
SOURCE:
I need everyone to be contacting your elected representatives and FDA officials to tell them NO Covid-19 shot for little kids and NO Future Framework. Children’s Health Defense also has an excellent call to action up on their site as well.
SOURCE:
So if the FDA authorizes Covid-19 shots for kids on June 14 and 15 and then approves the “Future Framework” on June 28th, the shots that will be given to kids in the fall will be the reformulated shots that skipped clinical trials.
SOURCE:
The Word, reader suggestions
quisling
THE END.
What is the word? I add to our list for consideration: quisling
Excellent post,fair knight! Just this last hour I finished both of those stacks from Drs Toby and Rose.
Substack is where minds are having open and frank discussions. Where debate (on many stacks,not all) is courted ,so that ideas may be justified or scrapped. Where the Resistance is honed.
I very much appreciate those ,like yourself,who'll add to the groundswell.